➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Demur Rumed, Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, mark.dickinson, nascheme, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, trent
Date 2018-01-02.17:32:12
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <be9456fc-e3c4-2e74-24e5-3fc001e90f49@free.fr>
In-reply-to <1514913215.86.0.467229070634.issue17611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
Le 02/01/2018 à 18:13, Mark Shannon a écrit :
> 
> Rather than go around in circles any more, I suggest that we merge Serhiy's PR (PR 5006). I can then cherry-pick my commits to clean up the implementation of the `with` statement (as a new PR).

Fair enough. I'm making a final review round on Serhiy's PR and
hopefully this will be in.

Also looking forward to the cleanup followup.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-01-02 17:32:12pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, nascheme, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, trent, Mark.Shannon, serhiy.storchaka, Demur Rumed
2018-01-02 17:32:12pitroulinkissue17611 messages
2018-01-02 17:32:12pitroucreate