Message309199
> My use case was outside control of otherwise unconditionally blocking task (for tests only). What replacement (if any) would you suggest?
Use Task.cancel() or use a Queue to communicate with the task. Your test code was working, but ultimately was creating an unexpected (and not officially documented/supported) situation for the task. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-12-29 21:58:00 | yselivanov | set | recipients:
+ yselivanov, asvetlov, Ilya.Kulakov |
2017-12-29 21:58:00 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1514584680.74.0.213398074469.issue32363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-12-29 21:58:00 | yselivanov | link | issue32363 messages |
2017-12-29 21:58:00 | yselivanov | create | |
|