This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author zunger
Recipients 45757, mdk, nitishch, serhiy.storchaka, zunger
Date 2017-12-26.11:48:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CA+hyJn3iP-KgqXdfJLCMUT92p1GVfivV-ADa9jWzvwkf2Qj_mg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1514287591.64.0.213398074469.issue32421@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
3.6.2. But Nick Coghlan pointed out elsewhere that the underlying issue is
more likely to be one of the other objects being pinned in-memory because
of the traceback, so the exception may actually be just an incidental
thing. I'm going to have to work on a better minimal repro case -- this
particular example had both a subprocess.Popen open at the time and a
message-channel object that holds some os.pipes, so there are all sorts of
fun things that may be causing the trouble.

I'll update the bug when I have a chance to do that and narrow it down a
bit more.

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Julien Palard <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Julien Palard <julien+python@palard.fr> added the comment:
>
> Tested with:
>
>     @memoize()
>     def foo(x):
>         raise Exception("From foo")
>
>
>     for _ ∈ range(5):
>         try:
>             foo(42)
>         except Exception as err:
>             print(err)
>
> using a python 3.5.4, 3.6.4, and master(13a6c09), and was unable to
> reproduce it, which version of Python are you using? How are you
> reproducing it?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +mdk
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32421>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2017-12-26 11:48:18zungersetrecipients: + zunger, serhiy.storchaka, mdk, nitishch, 45757
2017-12-26 11:48:18zungerlinkissue32421 messages
2017-12-26 11:48:18zungercreate