Author tjguk
Recipients ned.deily, paul.moore, skn78, steve.dower, thatiparthy, tim.golden, tjguk, zach.ware
Date 2017-12-21.21:43:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <14a90407-da28-cb6c-12e3-dc3940f50927@timgolden.me.uk>
In-reply-to <1513890800.9.0.213398074469.issue32394@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Excluding for now seems like a simple option. (Basically a reversion to 
previous behaviour). And allows us easily to include again later easily.

Messing with setsockopt seems a little more risky.

In short: I'm with you -- exclude for now.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-12-21 21:43:55tjguksetrecipients: + tjguk, paul.moore, tim.golden, ned.deily, zach.ware, steve.dower, thatiparthy, skn78
2017-12-21 21:43:55tjguklinkissue32394 messages
2017-12-21 21:43:55tjgukcreate