This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tjguk
Recipients ned.deily, paul.moore, skn78, steve.dower, thatiparthy, tim.golden, tjguk, zach.ware
Date 2017-12-21.21:43:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
Excluding for now seems like a simple option. (Basically a reversion to 
previous behaviour). And allows us easily to include again later easily.

Messing with setsockopt seems a little more risky.

In short: I'm with you -- exclude for now.
Date User Action Args
2017-12-21 21:43:55tjguksetrecipients: + tjguk, paul.moore, tim.golden, ned.deily, zach.ware, steve.dower, thatiparthy, skn78
2017-12-21 21:43:55tjguklinkissue32394 messages
2017-12-21 21:43:55tjgukcreate