Author Chris.Barker
Recipients Chris.Barker, docs@python, eric.smith, levkivskyi
Date 2017-12-19.02:41:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
It was suggested that I could contirbute to the docs of dataclasses in this issue. Which confuses me, as there doesn't appear to be any content here to comment on. But what the heck:

As I've been annoyingly persistent about on the python-dev list, I think we need to be quite careful about making type hints appear to be a requirement for using dataclasses. In order to counter this, we could:

* have the first couple example be type-less:

class C:
    a: ...   # field without a default
    b: ... = 0 # field with a default

or something like that.

Then purposely introduce "how to add type hints" a bit down in the docs.
Date User Action Args
2017-12-19 02:41:17Chris.Barkersetrecipients: + Chris.Barker, eric.smith, docs@python, levkivskyi
2017-12-19 02:41:17Chris.Barkersetmessageid: <>
2017-12-19 02:41:17Chris.Barkerlinkissue32216 messages
2017-12-19 02:41:16Chris.Barkercreate