Author sblondon
Recipients barry, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, sblondon, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2017-12-18.14:04:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
If the access is read-only, the lock is not required [1].  However, I agree
it does not worth to be more complex (changing the signature of the
subclass or adding another context manager for the lock).
I updated the patch and documentation so the mailbox is locked at the

1:  For example, the first source code example at
Date User Action Args
2017-12-18 14:04:06sblondonsetrecipients: + sblondon, barry, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka
2017-12-18 14:04:06sblondonlinkissue32234 messages
2017-12-18 14:04:06sblondoncreate