➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jfbu
Recipients Mariatta, docs@python, jfbu, mdk, ned.deily, willingc
Date 2017-12-03.08:53:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1512291201.66.0.213398074469.issue32200@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
For info, the xetex problem "Improper discretionary list" is presumably the one seen at  https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/3546. I asked on xetex mailing list at http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2017-March/027056.html to which xetex bug it was related but it appears I got no reply. Hence I don't know the precise xetex release which fixed it, but it is ok with `XeTeX 0.99996`. No action was taken on Sphinx side as this appeared to be a XeTeX bug only.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-12-03 08:53:21jfbusetrecipients: + jfbu, ned.deily, docs@python, willingc, mdk, Mariatta
2017-12-03 08:53:21jfbusetmessageid: <1512291201.66.0.213398074469.issue32200@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-12-03 08:53:21jfbulinkissue32200 messages
2017-12-03 08:53:21jfbucreate