Author pitrou
Recipients alex, barry, eric.araujo, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date 2017-11-12.11:41:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <03bae0ec-4671-c3c1-85a1-2bed00411eb6@free.fr>
In-reply-to <1510486808.28.0.213398074469.issue31975@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Le 12/11/2017 à 12:40, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> 
> My impression is that you've been arguing that my changes don't go far enough (i.e. you'd prefer full reversion to the pre-2.7 behaviour), not that the status quo is superior.

Ideally yes.  That said, I also thought that the special case you were
proposing was pointless.

Now I've changed my mind though.  Your PEP makes a good convincing
argument.  Thanks for writing it!
History
Date User Action Args
2017-11-12 11:41:30pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, barry, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, alex, r.david.murray
2017-11-12 11:41:30pitroulinkissue31975 messages
2017-11-12 11:41:29pitroucreate