Author mark.dickinson
Recipients davin, jeff.allen, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, tim.peters
Date 2017-11-02.16:04:24
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1509638664.85.0.213398074469.issue31630@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I'd be surprised if sin(x)/cos(x) were materially better.

Yep. I made the same assumption as you, but then "realised" that to get to the tan tests, we must already have passed all the cos tests, so cos must be okay. 

I thought I'd written cos tests near pi/2 as well as tan ones, but unfortunately it turns out that's not true. My bad. Those tests should probably be added to cmath_testcases.txt.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-11-02 16:04:24mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, rhettinger, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, jeff.allen, davin
2017-11-02 16:04:24mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1509638664.85.0.213398074469.issue31630@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-11-02 16:04:24mark.dickinsonlinkissue31630 messages
2017-11-02 16:04:24mark.dickinsoncreate