Author vstinner
Recipients benjamin.peterson, neologix, njs, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, tim.peters, trent, vstinner, wscullin, xdegaye
Date 2017-11-01.01:15:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1509498954.99.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
msg196194: Antoine Pitrou: "Note that the current small object allocator, if not disabled, *should* already return you aligned memory, by construction (each allocation size has dedicated pools from which memory blocks are carved)."

In my current implementation of _PyObject_AlignedAlloc(), I only call pymalloc_alloc() for alignment <= pymalloc ALIGNMENT. Maybe we can do better?
History
Date User Action Args
2017-11-01 01:15:55vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, rhettinger, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, trent, njs, skrah, neologix, xdegaye, wscullin
2017-11-01 01:15:54vstinnersetmessageid: <1509498954.99.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-11-01 01:15:54vstinnerlinkissue18835 messages
2017-11-01 01:15:54vstinnercreate