Author vstinner
Recipients benjamin.peterson, neologix, njs, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, tim.peters, trent, vstinner, wscullin, xdegaye
Date 2017-10-31.14:26:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1509459976.6.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Stefan Krah: "we care about the C11 restriction? (...) "size - number of bytes to allocate. An integral multiple of alignment" (...) posix_memalign and _aligned_malloc don't care about the multiple."

I prefer to ignore this restriction at this point.

I wouldn't be surprised if posix_memalign() and _aligned_malloc() already align the size for us internally.

We can add the restriction later, if needed.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-10-31 14:26:16vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, rhettinger, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, trent, njs, skrah, neologix, xdegaye, wscullin
2017-10-31 14:26:16vstinnersetmessageid: <1509459976.6.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-10-31 14:26:16vstinnerlinkissue18835 messages
2017-10-31 14:26:16vstinnercreate