Message305013
I'd stick with ValueError in that case as well. if someone dislikes the
valueerrors because they _want_ to use an invalid one, they can file a bug
and we'll reconsider only if they have a meaningful use case.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:36 AM Serhiy Storchaka <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
>
> Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpython@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> What to do with values outside of the valid range (2**4 to 2**31 for
> Blowfish, 1000 to 999999999 for SHA*). Raise ValueError, OverflowError, or
> bound it, or just generate an invalid salt and allow crypt() to handle it?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +haypo, pitrou
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31702>
> _______________________________________
> |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-10-25 22:46:49 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients:
+ gregory.p.smith, jafo, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka, dstufft |
2017-10-25 22:46:49 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue31702 messages |
2017-10-25 22:46:49 | gregory.p.smith | create | |
|