This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gregory.p.smith
Recipients christian.heimes, dstufft, gregory.p.smith, jafo, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2017-10-25.22:46:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
I'd stick with ValueError in that case as well.  if someone dislikes the
valueerrors because they _want_ to use an invalid one, they can file a bug
and we'll reconsider only if they have a meaningful use case.

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:36 AM Serhiy Storchaka <>

> Serhiy Storchaka <> added the comment:
> What to do with values outside of the valid range (2**4 to 2**31 for
> Blowfish, 1000 to 999999999 for SHA*). Raise ValueError, OverflowError, or
> bound it, or just generate an invalid salt and allow crypt() to handle it?
> ----------
> nosy: +haypo, pitrou
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <>
> <>
> _______________________________________
Date User Action Args
2017-10-25 22:46:49gregory.p.smithsetrecipients: + gregory.p.smith, jafo, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka, dstufft
2017-10-25 22:46:49gregory.p.smithlinkissue31702 messages
2017-10-25 22:46:49gregory.p.smithcreate