Message304997
On 25.10.2017 01:31, STINNER Victor wrote:
>
> Marc-Andre: "Yes, to avoid yet another Python 2/3 difference. It should be replaced with the appropriate variant on Windows and non-Windows platforms. From Serhiy's response that's time.process_time() on non-Windows platforms and time.perf_counter() on Windows."
>
> I don't understand why you mean by "replaced with". Do you mean modify the implementation of the time.clock()?
What I meant is that time.clock() is replaced with the higher
accuracy timers corresponding to the current time.clock()
implementation on the various platforms in order to retain
backwards compatibility.
In other words:
if sys.platform == 'win32':
time.clock = time.perf_counter
else:
time.clock = time.process_time
I know that time.clock() behaves differently on different platforms,
but this fact has been known for a long time and is being used by
Python code out there for timing purposes. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-10-25 16:09:05 | lemburg | set | recipients:
+ lemburg, fdrake, belopolsky, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, mrabarnett, benhoyt, ethan.furman, serhiy.storchaka |
2017-10-25 16:09:05 | lemburg | link | issue31803 messages |
2017-10-25 16:09:05 | lemburg | create | |
|