Author ced
Recipients anish.shah, berker.peksag, ced, ebarry, ghaering, lelit, palaviv, r.david.murray
Date 2017-10-23.09:59:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1508752774.78.0.213398074469.issue27645@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm using sqlitebck which provides similar functionality but instead of using a file name to store the backup it uses connection instances.
I find it very useful. Here is my use case: to run tests of an application that requires a database filled, I do a 'copy' of an existing sqlite backup in a ':memory:' database.
But with the proposed API, it is not possible to use the resulted ':memory:' database because it will be delete when the connection is closed.
So I propose to add the option to pass a connection instead of a filename.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-10-23 09:59:35cedsetrecipients: + ced, ghaering, r.david.murray, berker.peksag, lelit, ebarry, anish.shah, palaviv
2017-10-23 09:59:34cedsetmessageid: <1508752774.78.0.213398074469.issue27645@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-10-23 09:59:34cedlinkissue27645 messages
2017-10-23 09:59:34cedcreate