➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tim.peters
Recipients davin, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, tim.peters
Date 2017-10-17.02:01:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1508205693.07.0.213398074469.issue31630@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
On 16 Oct 2017, exactly the same test failures were reported on python-dev:

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149880.html

From the test output posted there:

"""
== CPython 3.6.3 (default, Oct 16 2017, 14:42:21) [GCC 4.7.2]
== Linux-3.2.0-4-686-pae-i686-with-debian-7.11 little-endian
"""

And I just noticed that in issue27953 exactly the same bad tan result() was reported (on "OS X Tiger").

It's hard to believe that three different systems (four, if I include wxMaxima) deliver exactly the same bad result by accident.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-10-17 02:01:33tim.peterssetrecipients: + tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, davin
2017-10-17 02:01:33tim.peterssetmessageid: <1508205693.07.0.213398074469.issue31630@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-10-17 02:01:33tim.peterslinkissue31630 messages
2017-10-17 02:01:32tim.peterscreate