Message 304373 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	akvadrako, brett.cannon, eric.snow, ncoghlan
Date	2017-10-14.04:33:40
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1507955621.54.0.213398074469.issue31772@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Aye, I think that check would make the most sense, since the bytecode invalidation check is "_r_long(raw_timestamp) != source_mtime" (to allow for things like version control operations that send source timestamps backwards). A test for that could then just mock time.time() to make sure it returned a time matching the source mtime, and checked that the bytecode wasn't written.

Aye, I think that check would make the most sense, since the bytecode invalidation check is "_r_long(raw_timestamp) != source_mtime" (to allow for things like version control operations that send source timestamps backwards).

A test for that could then just mock time.time() to make sure it returned  a time matching the source mtime, and checked that the bytecode wasn't written.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-10-14 04:33:41	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, brett.cannon, eric.snow, akvadrako
2017-10-14 04:33:41	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1507955621.54.0.213398074469.issue31772@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-10-14 04:33:41	ncoghlan	link	issue31772 messages
2017-10-14 04:33:40	ncoghlan	create