This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steve.dower
Recipients Safihre, paul.moore, skrah, steve.dower, terry.reedy, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2017-09-30.23:33:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1506814381.19.0.213398074469.issue31555@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The difference is on startup in how they generate sys.path entries.

Skip the install step and directly run the library in a clean virtual environment, so that no .pth or .egg files are in use. If the difference still occurs, show that it also occurs on a recent version of Python as well and we can look at it

I promise you, there is only one way that extension modules get loaded. The performance difference is not because of anything in core.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-09-30 23:33:01steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, terry.reedy, paul.moore, tim.golden, skrah, zach.ware, Safihre
2017-09-30 23:33:01steve.dowersetmessageid: <1506814381.19.0.213398074469.issue31555@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-09-30 23:33:01steve.dowerlinkissue31555 messages
2017-09-30 23:33:01steve.dowercreate