➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, lemburg, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2017-09-25.19:14:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJJvsb+H8frwPMLL3BF685QpEFAkN2LDDaFnero4myNr_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <c2c00eae-f69c-353c-b2ef-e037db35a5fc@free.fr>
Content 
It should be like 'if key in dct: del dct[key]'. It may fail when two
threads do this but the *internal* state of dct should not be compromised.

On Sep 25, 2017 2:45 AM, "Antoine Pitrou" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> Le 25/09/2017 à 11:39, STINNER Victor a écrit :
> >
> > Antoine: "I'm wary of raising an exception.  Assuming Benjamin's patch
> is correct, I vote for it."
> >
> > Can you please elaborate? You are fine with the fact that iter(file) in
> two thread can return the same line?
>
> AFAIU it already could.  Iteration on Python 2 files is fragile, now is
> not the time to fix fundamental bugs in Python 2.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31530>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2017-09-25 19:14:43gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, lemburg, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, serhiy.storchaka
2017-09-25 19:14:43gvanrossumlinkissue31530 messages
2017-09-25 19:14:43gvanrossumcreate