Author pitrou
Recipients germn, pitrou, r.david.murray, yselivanov
Date 2017-09-21.15:47:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1506008824.7.0.798775582014.issue31539@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
AFAIR the Windows clock has a 15ms granularity, so I'm not really surprised. In other words, I don't think `asyncio.sleep` sleeps less than expected, but that it's the imprecision of time.time() which gives you that impression.

What happens if you replace `time.time()` with `time.perf_counter()` in the code above?
History
Date User Action Args
2017-09-21 15:47:04pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, r.david.murray, yselivanov, germn
2017-09-21 15:47:04pitrousetmessageid: <1506008824.7.0.798775582014.issue31539@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-09-21 15:47:04pitroulinkissue31539 messages
2017-09-21 15:47:04pitroucreate