Martin Panter

> I’m a bit confused. In the current patch, the new type_str() function
> appears to use the “qualname” (which I support), but some of the test
> changes seem to contradict this, e.g.:

>  >>> C.foo(1)
> -classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
> +classmethod C 1

C is a qualname, as would be C.NestedD or something.<locals>.NestedD
The qualname PEP explains why the module is not part of the qualname.


Me
> Finally, I don’t remember why I changed functions and modules when the two
> original use cases were only for classes.

The reason is a message by Nick on python-ideas.