Author pitrou
Recipients JohanAR, davin, gvanrossum, itamarst, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, yselivanov, zzzeek
Date 2017-08-19.12:05:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <7b84a937-674c-25bf-9655-108654d31cfb@free.fr>
In-reply-to <1503137357.75.0.0790236421215.issue14976@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Le 19/08/2017 à 12:09, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> 
> Would it be feasible to change the behaviour of non-reentrant locks such that:
> 
> 1. They *do* keep track of the owning thread

Yes.

> 2. Trying to acquire them again when the current thread already has them locked raises RuntimeError instead of deadlocking the way it does now?

No.  It's not a deadlock, since you can release a Lock from another thread.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-08-19 12:05:56pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, ncoghlan, zzzeek, python-dev, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, JohanAR, yselivanov, itamarst, davin
2017-08-19 12:05:56pitroulinkissue14976 messages
2017-08-19 12:05:56pitroucreate