Message 300574 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	JohanAR, davin, gvanrossum, itamarst, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, yselivanov, zzzeek
Date	2017-08-19.08:53:41
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<ee909ab3-f243-40e5-cab0-2f5ffc4e4467@free.fr>
In-reply-to	<1503091613.09.0.382886788001.issue14976@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Le 18/08/2017 à 23:26, Guido van Rossum a écrit : > > IIUC the end result would be a Queue whose put() works from signal handlers, GC callbacks and __del__, as long as it's unbounded, right? Yes. > And when it is bounded, it will give a decent message if the queue is full and the lock is already taken, right? Currently it gives a decent message on any bounded queue, even if not full. That may be improved, I'd have to investigate how.

Le 18/08/2017 à 23:26, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> 
> IIUC the end result would be a Queue whose put() works from signal handlers, GC callbacks and __del__, as long as it's unbounded, right?

Yes.

> And when it *is* bounded, it will give a decent message if the queue is full and the lock is already taken, right? 

Currently it gives a decent message on any bounded queue, even if not
full.  That may be improved, I'd have to investigate how.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-08-19 08:53:41	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, ncoghlan, zzzeek, python-dev, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, JohanAR, yselivanov, itamarst, davin
2017-08-19 08:53:41	pitrou	link	issue14976 messages
2017-08-19 08:53:41	pitrou	create