Author ncoghlan
Recipients Arfrever, acassaigne, docs@python, gregory.p.smith, josh.r, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, tim.golden, vstinner
Date 2017-08-09.03:28:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1502249298.78.0.521809447135.issue22635@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I've added Greg to the nosy list and filed an issue with subprocess32 about this: https://github.com/google/python-subprocess32/issues/30

I did that mainly to make sure they don't inadvertently backport this regression, but also to ask if subprocess32 might potentially provide a way to get the old intended-but-not-actually-tested behaviour back in 3.x.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-08-09 03:28:18ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, gregory.p.smith, vstinner, tim.golden, Arfrever, r.david.murray, docs@python, acassaigne, josh.r
2017-08-09 03:28:18ncoghlansetmessageid: <1502249298.78.0.521809447135.issue22635@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-08-09 03:28:18ncoghlanlinkissue22635 messages
2017-08-09 03:28:18ncoghlancreate