This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients cheryl.sabella, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2017-08-07.15:26:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1502119592.29.0.0184899195735.issue31004@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Idlelib is a bit exceptional: see PEP 434.  Except for one test and the news files, I keep idlelib identical in 3.6 and 3.7.  This makes all backports, *including new tests*, trivial and overall reduces the risk of regression (unless IDLE 3.6 were abandoned completely).  The risk of regression is why I have only touched 3.6/7 since last Fall, why I am increasingly strict about testing, and why I will manually test everything at least a few days before the next release candidate.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-08-07 15:26:32terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, vstinner, cheryl.sabella
2017-08-07 15:26:32terry.reedysetmessageid: <1502119592.29.0.0184899195735.issue31004@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-08-07 15:26:32terry.reedylinkissue31004 messages
2017-08-07 15:26:32terry.reedycreate