This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Lisabel Leon
Recipients Lisabel Leon, docs@python, matrixise, zach.ware
Date 2017-07-25.16:04:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAPQ6vML4MewMjeTeUewptvOP02Tso=Y4k8ORPnFSZs_DDJSU7w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1500998175.37.0.333153972342.issue31037@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Thank you Zachary for such a speedy response.
I'll paste text next time.

Rgds!
Lisabel

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Zachary Ware <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Zachary Ware added the comment:
>
> Take a look at the statement immediately following the example:
>
> "(Yes, this is the correct code. Look closely: the else clause belongs to
> the for loop, not the if statement.)"
>
> The example is correct, and is introducing the concept of an 'else' clause
> on a for loop.  This is very much not the first report of this that we've
> had, though; perhaps the 'look closely' admonition should be moved before
> the example?
>
> For future reference, please copy and paste the text of your tests rather
> than a screenshot; not all participants can see the screenshot.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +zach.ware
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31037>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2017-07-25 16:04:20Lisabel Leonsetrecipients: + Lisabel Leon, docs@python, zach.ware, matrixise
2017-07-25 16:04:20Lisabel Leonlinkissue31037 messages
2017-07-25 16:04:19Lisabel Leoncreate