Author Jelle Zijlstra
Recipients Jelle Zijlstra, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, inada.naoki, lazka, llllllllll, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang
Date 2017-07-19.05:39:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1500442787.58.0.538233281427.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Thanks Joe! I adapted your benchmark suite to also run my implementation. See https://github.com/JelleZijlstra/cnamedtuple/commit/61b6fbf4de37f8131ab43c619593327004974e52 for the code and results. The results are consistent with what we've seen before.

Joe's cnamedtuple is about 40x faster for class creation than the current implementation, and my PR only speeds class creation up by 4x. That difference is big enough that I think we should seriously consider using the C implementation.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-07-19 05:39:47Jelle Zijlstrasetrecipients: + Jelle Zijlstra, gvanrossum, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, inada.naoki, serhiy.storchaka, llllllllll, xiang.zhang, lazka
2017-07-19 05:39:47Jelle Zijlstrasetmessageid: <1500442787.58.0.538233281427.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-07-19 05:39:47Jelle Zijlstralinkissue28638 messages
2017-07-19 05:39:47Jelle Zijlstracreate