Author giampaolo.rodola
Recipients Jelle Zijlstra, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, inada.naoki, lazka, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang
Date 2017-07-18.15:52:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1500393139.86.0.776627962664.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Should we consider a C-based implementation like https://github.com/llllllllll/cnamedtuple? 
> It could improve speed even more, but would be harder to maintain and
> test and harder to keep compatible. My sense is that it's not worth
> it unless benchmarks show a really dramatic difference.

I've just filed a ticket for this: https://github.com/llllllllll/cnamedtuple/issues/7
History
Date User Action Args
2017-07-18 15:52:19giampaolo.rodolasetrecipients: + giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, inada.naoki, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, Jelle Zijlstra, lazka
2017-07-18 15:52:19giampaolo.rodolasetmessageid: <1500393139.86.0.776627962664.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-07-18 15:52:19giampaolo.rodolalinkissue28638 messages
2017-07-18 15:52:19giampaolo.rodolacreate