Message298490
Check the issue history - the issue has been rejected by Raymond, and then reopened for further debate by other core developers multiple times.
That's not a reasonable approach to requesting reconsideration of a module/API maintainers design decision.
I acknowledge that those earlier reopenings weren't by you, but the issue should still remain closed until *Raymond* agrees to reconsider it (and given the alternative option of instead making the lower overhead PyStructSequence visible at the Python level, I'd be surprised if he does). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-07-17 12:28:41 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, rhettinger, pitrou, eric.smith, methane, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, JelleZijlstra |
2017-07-17 12:28:41 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1500294521.64.0.764217491824.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-07-17 12:28:41 | ncoghlan | link | issue28638 messages |
2017-07-17 12:28:41 | ncoghlan | create | |
|