This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jyasskin
Recipients Paxxi, jyasskin, mark.dickinson, paul.moore, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware
Date 2017-06-26.05:10:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1498453817.13.0.600876524425.issue30747@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Has enough time passed that you can use the C11 atomic types and operations instead of special-casing these for each compiler? (e.g. http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/atomic/atomic_store)
History
Date User Action Args
2017-06-26 05:10:17jyasskinsetrecipients: + jyasskin, paul.moore, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, tim.golden, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, Paxxi
2017-06-26 05:10:17jyasskinsetmessageid: <1498453817.13.0.600876524425.issue30747@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-06-26 05:10:17jyasskinlinkissue30747 messages
2017-06-26 05:10:16jyasskincreate