Message 294915 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	rhettinger, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2017-06-01.07:43:33
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1496303014.03.0.721610092166.issue30534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
See also "[Python-ideas] Positional-only parameters" discussion of last March: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-March/044956.html Brett Cannon: "It seems all the core devs who have commented on this are in the positive (Victor, Yury, Ethan, Yury, Guido, Terry, and Steven; MAL didn't explicitly vote). So to me that suggests there's enough support to warrant writing a PEP. (...)" (No, I didn't write such PEP yet :-p) Maybe we can also enhance the error message to explain that the function accepts exactly one positional-only argument?

See also "[Python-ideas] Positional-only parameters" discussion of last March:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-March/044956.html

Brett Cannon: "It seems all the core devs who have commented on this are in the positive (Victor, Yury, Ethan, Yury, Guido, Terry, and Steven; MAL didn't explicitly vote). So to me that suggests there's enough support to warrant writing a PEP. (...)"

(No, I didn't write such PEP yet :-p)

Maybe we can also enhance the error message to explain that the function accepts exactly one positional-only argument?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-06-01 07:43:34	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, scoder, serhiy.storchaka
2017-06-01 07:43:34	vstinner	set	messageid: <1496303014.03.0.721610092166.issue30534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-06-01 07:43:34	vstinner	link	issue30534 messages
2017-06-01 07:43:33	vstinner	create