Message292194
As Martin notes, my concern is that I can go for years without having to touch the low level files (since syntax changes are rare), so it's important to me to make it easy to remember and/or relearn how to regenerate them.
However, suitable make commands (e.g. a "make regen" target, with "make regen-X" subtargets) would qualify as "easy to remember", and would also be amenable to automated testing in combination with a `make clobber-gen` command.
(Tangent on target naming: I think 'rebuild' would be confusing, while 'regenerate' is a bit long, especially if there are more specific subtargets. 'regen' is just a shortened version of the latter) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-04-24 06:01:43 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, brett.cannon, vstinner, ned.deily, ezio.melotti, python-dev, berker.peksag, martin.panter, zach.ware, koobs, willingc, josh.r, vlee, yan12125 |
2017-04-24 06:01:43 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1493013703.11.0.721417267893.issue23404@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-04-24 06:01:43 | ncoghlan | link | issue23404 messages |
2017-04-24 06:01:42 | ncoghlan | create | |
|