This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients berker.peksag, brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, josh.r, koobs, martin.panter, ncoghlan, ned.deily, python-dev, vlee, vstinner, willingc, yan12125, zach.ware
Date 2017-04-23.01:02:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Do you mean a separate makefile rule to rebuild the generated files, rather than rebuilding them in a normal “make all” build? I would support this; this is what I meant with my “make regenerate” proposal in response to Nick linked above.
Date User Action Args
2017-04-23 01:02:22martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, ned.deily, ezio.melotti, python-dev, berker.peksag, zach.ware, koobs, willingc, josh.r, vlee, yan12125
2017-04-23 01:02:22martin.pantersetmessageid: <>
2017-04-23 01:02:22martin.panterlinkissue23404 messages
2017-04-23 01:02:21martin.pantercreate