multiprocessing.Pool.__exit__() calls terminate() instead of close(). Why? Wouldn't it be better (and more expected from a user's point of view) if it called close()?

Reasons:

- Calling close() would wait until all tasks are completed before shutting down the pool instead of terminating them abruptly when some of them may still be running.

- concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor.__exit__() calls shutdown(wait=True), which waits until all tasks are finished. In this regard, the behavior of Pool.__exit__() is inconsistent.

See also this comment by Dan O'Reilly (http://bugs.python.org/msg242120), who expressed an identical concern two years ago.