This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients metathink, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2017-03-28.12:57:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1490705823.26.0.0582002697468.issue29930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Proof-of-concept of patched drain() to support multiple waiters.

I don't see any strong reason to not allow two coroutines to wait on drain() in parallel?

I'm too lazy to write a full patch with unit tests, doc changed, etc. I started with a PoC to discuss the solution.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-03-28 12:57:03vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, yselivanov, metathink
2017-03-28 12:57:03vstinnersetmessageid: <1490705823.26.0.0582002697468.issue29930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-03-28 12:57:03vstinnerlinkissue29930 messages
2017-03-28 12:57:03vstinnercreate