Message289379
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
> I agree that it is better to use directly the module implementing the codecs. But old third-party code still can use non-text codecs.
>
> There should be good reasons for breaking backward compatibility. Wouldn't be better to deprecate codecs.open()?
I'm not sure that I understood. Do you consider that using
codecs.open() with a non-text codecs is a "legit" use case or not?
I understood that you suggest a smoother transition using a
deprecation to give more time to developers to update their code.
But what do you want to deprecate? The whole codecs.open() function?
Or using non-text codecs with codecs.open()? Or using text codecs with
codecs.open()? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-10 15:46:26 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, lemburg, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka |
2017-03-10 15:46:26 | vstinner | link | issue29783 messages |
2017-03-10 15:46:26 | vstinner | create | |
|