Message288645
> Another point is that it may be better to keep the existing parameter name “value”, rather than (eventually?) replacing it with “exc”. I think both of these things could be accomplished by juggling the “value” and “etype” parameters:
I agreed, and that what I would have done outside of CPython, but that felt like this kind of juggling was frowned upon.
> The disadvantage of any of these changes is that we may want to maintain support for the old signature while Python 2 remains alive.
Your example does not seem to break the old signature. Or I fail to see how.
If that way would be accepted I'm happy to implement it. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-02-27 15:44:30 | mbussonn | set | recipients:
+ mbussonn, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, martin.panter |
2017-02-27 15:44:30 | mbussonn | set | messageid: <1488210270.75.0.177637293324.issue26389@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-02-27 15:44:30 | mbussonn | link | issue26389 messages |
2017-02-27 15:44:30 | mbussonn | create | |
|