Message288493
> Perhaps it should instead use two specific flags, TYPEFLAG_HASBITFIELD and TYPEFLAG_HASUNION
This seems better at first sight. It's not making any suitability decisions (apart from doing the unrolling), and the meaning of these flags will be less volatile than TYPEFLAG_NONARGTYPE because that assessment depends on current limitations, and those limitations might change over time.
I'm going into a period of two weeks where I may not have much time to work on this due to other time commitments, so if you want to press on with it, go right ahead :-) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-02-23 22:46:08 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, weeble, meador.inge, eryksun, Ilya.Kulakov, alexei.romanov |
2017-02-23 22:46:07 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1487889967.98.0.669175213484.issue22273@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-02-23 22:46:07 | vinay.sajip | link | issue22273 messages |
2017-02-23 22:46:07 | vinay.sajip | create | |
|