Message 288279 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jwuttke
Recipients	Winterflower, berker.peksag, davin, docs@python, jwuttke, methane
Date	2017-02-21.09:11:38
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<7fc0c475-c8ca-0317-a043-0a1ced6620f1@fz-juelich.de>
In-reply-to	<1487667893.83.0.347164365226.issue29575@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I never proposed to add a second example, but to make the one example more meaningful. As a minimal solution, could we replace the numbers 3 (input data) and 5 (threads) by a slightly more plausible choice? Davin explained why numbers should be incommensurate. So what about 10 data, 3 threads?

I never proposed to add a second example, but to make the one example more meaningful.

As a minimal solution, could we replace the numbers 3 (input data) and 5 (threads)
by a slightly more plausible choice? Davin explained why numbers should be
incommensurate. So what about 10 data, 3 threads?

Files
File name	Uploaded
smime.p7s	jwuttke, 2017-02-21.09:11:38

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-02-21 09:11:39	jwuttke	set	recipients: + jwuttke, methane, docs@python, berker.peksag, davin, Winterflower
2017-02-21 09:11:39	jwuttke	link	issue29575 messages
2017-02-21 09:11:38	jwuttke	create