Author vstinner
Recipients lemburg, mark.dickinson, methane, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2017-02-14.10:16:28
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1487067389.18.0.5784746708.issue29548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Please note that the two sets of APIs are not identical, e.g. you cannot simply replace PyEval_CallObject() with PyObject_Call(), since the former applies a few extra checks and defaults, which the latter doesn't.

IMHO these checks are too expensive at runtime for little benefit. If you pass non-tuple to PyObject_Call(), Python immediately crash. You are immediately noticied of the bug :-) I don't think that such bugs are common enough to justify the overhead.

Any idea of the popularity of the undocumented PyEval_xxx() functions? Are they used by Cython for example? By a single random extension module in the world?

I'm more in favor of modifying PyEval_xxx() to call PyObject_xxx() and deprecate them.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-02-14 10:16:29vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, lemburg, mark.dickinson, methane, serhiy.storchaka
2017-02-14 10:16:29vstinnersetmessageid: <1487067389.18.0.5784746708.issue29548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-02-14 10:16:29vstinnerlinkissue29548 messages
2017-02-14 10:16:28vstinnercreate