Message 287106 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	python-dev, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2017-02-06.08:50:04
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1486371004.39.0.304479674692.issue29460@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Oh right, I recall that I proposed it. Thanks for this change :-) The next question might it: would it be worth it to try using unlikely() macro on (kwargs == NULL) test in the macro? ;-) I'm talking about GCC/Clang __builtin_expect: #define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect((x),0)

Oh right, I recall that I proposed it. Thanks for this change :-)

The next question might it: would it be worth it to try using unlikely() macro on (kwargs == NULL) test in the macro? ;-)

I'm talking about GCC/Clang __builtin_expect:

#define unlikely(x)     __builtin_expect((x),0)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-02-06 08:50:04	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka
2017-02-06 08:50:04	vstinner	set	messageid: <1486371004.39.0.304479674692.issue29460@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-02-06 08:50:04	vstinner	link	issue29460 messages
2017-02-06 08:50:04	vstinner	create