Message286658
Victor: "I plan to run a benchmark when all my patches to reduce the stack consumption will be ready."
msg285200 of issue #28870: "I also ran the reliable performance benchmark suite with LTO+PGO. There is no significant performance change on these benchmarks (...)"
less_stack.patch:
-#define _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK 5
+#define _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK 3
With the issue #28870, reducing _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK value is no more needed. Larger _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK means better performances, so I prefer to keep the value 5 (arguments).
The main change, inline call_function(), was merged, so I close the issue. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-02-01 17:10:46 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
2017-02-01 17:10:46 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1485969046.56.0.407215399373.issue29227@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-02-01 17:10:46 | vstinner | link | issue29227 messages |
2017-02-01 17:10:46 | vstinner | create | |
|