Message286035
I don't think this is a regression, bug, bogos naming.
I agree that "<concurrent.futures.thread.ThreadPoolExecutor object at 0x7f96711ac278>_0" is ugly.
But the name describes what is the thread, than "Thread-1".
How about giving default thread_name_prefix less ugly?
e.g. "ThreadPoolExecutor-worker". |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-01-23 01:27:04 | methane | set | recipients:
+ methane, bquinlan, desbma |
2017-01-23 01:27:04 | methane | set | messageid: <1485134824.55.0.844588043915.issue29212@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-01-23 01:27:04 | methane | link | issue29212 messages |
2017-01-23 01:27:03 | methane | create | |
|