Author palaviv
Recipients Big Stone, berker.peksag, callidomus, fschulze, ghaering, jaraco, malin, ned.deily, palaviv, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, xiang.zhang
Date 2017-01-20.09:10:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1484903453.64.0.012584490699.issue28518@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Uploading a new patch with fixes from Ma Lin comments.
Two points:
1. Should we add the VACUUM with a explicit commit? Maybe there should be an implicit commit before VACUUM?
2. Should a SELECT start a transaction? I think it should according to PEP 249. There is a open issue on the case (#9924). Should we just change this on this patch?
History
Date User Action Args
2017-01-20 09:10:53palavivsetrecipients: + palaviv, ghaering, jaraco, ned.deily, r.david.murray, socketpair, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, malin, xiang.zhang, Big Stone, fschulze, callidomus
2017-01-20 09:10:53palavivsetmessageid: <1484903453.64.0.012584490699.issue28518@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-01-20 09:10:53palavivlinkissue28518 messages
2017-01-20 09:10:53palavivcreate