➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2017-01-10.23:00:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1484089251.08.0.26668900197.issue29227@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I didn't provide results with less_stack.patch because they were almost the same, just 1-3% faster. That might be just a random noise or compiler artifact. But may be an effect of inlining call_function().

Could you run full Python benchmarks? Decreasing the size of small stack doesn't impact a performance in these cases, but may impact a performance of calls with larger number of arguments. AFAIK the size of some small stacks already was decreased from 8 to 5.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-01-10 23:00:51serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
2017-01-10 23:00:51serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1484089251.08.0.26668900197.issue29227@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-01-10 23:00:51serhiy.storchakalinkissue29227 messages
2017-01-10 23:00:50serhiy.storchakacreate