Message284687
Aside from a couple of outdated comments and the EPERM question, the attached patch looks good to me.
Regarding EPERM, I think it would make sense to make py_getrandom and py_getentropy handle that consistently, otherwise I can see future maintainers readily getting confused by the discrepancy. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-01-05 01:44:28 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, vstinner, christian.heimes |
2017-01-05 01:44:27 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1483580667.8.0.61691152647.issue29157@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-01-05 01:44:27 | ncoghlan | link | issue29157 messages |
2017-01-05 01:44:27 | ncoghlan | create | |
|