➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2017-01-03.01:40:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1483407646.26.0.0527735337015.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
no_small_stack.patch: And now something completely different, a patch to remove the "small stack" alllocated on the C stack, always use the heap memory. FYI I created no_small_stack.patch from less_stack.patch.

As expected, the stack usage is lower:

* less_stack.patch: 384 bytes/call
* no_small_stack.patch: 368 bytes/call

I didn't check the performance of no_small_stack.patch yet.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-01-03 01:40:46vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka
2017-01-03 01:40:46vstinnersetmessageid: <1483407646.26.0.0527735337015.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-01-03 01:40:46vstinnerlinkissue28870 messages
2017-01-03 01:40:46vstinnercreate