This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steve.dower
Recipients Mr B Jones, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2016-12-29.17:53:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1483034016.13.0.541644861358.issue29033@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Does SCCM support dependency provider keys? If so, Python 3.6.0 and 3.5.3 and later will set one of these (see issue28846), which should make it easier to detect the whole bundle. Previous versions of 3.5 used a random GUID here.

I managed to reproduce the issue on a test machine by running a per-user install as admin, then the per-machine install. I tried a few ideas to treat the per-user and per-machine installs more distinctly, but nothing seems to work well. Most likely, I'll just have to add a more serious block when there's an existing install and prevent the second bad installation, though I haven't yet figured out how to do that.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-12-29 17:53:36steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, paul.moore, tim.golden, zach.ware, Mr B Jones
2016-12-29 17:53:36steve.dowersetmessageid: <1483034016.13.0.541644861358.issue29033@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-12-29 17:53:36steve.dowerlinkissue29033 messages
2016-12-29 17:53:35steve.dowercreate