This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Eric Lafontaine
Recipients Eric Lafontaine, barry, bpoaugust, r.david.murray
Date 2016-12-22.15:38:40
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1482421121.06.0.126444138231.issue28945@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Hi,

I would like to have a bigger set of user testing this patch before it gets approve... I really don't know all the extent to which it's a good/bad idea.  

The proposition was to not do the unquote in the rfc2231 collapse method.  It doesn't break anything on my machine on all the email tests... but I can't feel safe.

I also added the 2 test case for future support (multiline boundary and single line boundary).  It's basically the code I pasted on my answer on the 2016-12-20.

Let me know what you think.  Is it there we should stop doing it?

Regards,
Eric Lafontaine
History
Date User Action Args
2016-12-22 15:38:41Eric Lafontainesetrecipients: + Eric Lafontaine, barry, r.david.murray, bpoaugust
2016-12-22 15:38:41Eric Lafontainesetmessageid: <1482421121.06.0.126444138231.issue28945@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-12-22 15:38:41Eric Lafontainelinkissue28945 messages
2016-12-22 15:38:40Eric Lafontainecreate