Message283438
It is effortless to make this change and is consistent with all the other efforts taken to to protect against reentrancy, so yes, I think it should be done. It isn't so much that I want this to be a use case, I would just like the implementation to be as sound as reasonably possible so that we don't find the LRU cache to be at heart of some future hard-to-find bug in a complex application.
How does the patch look to you? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-12-16 21:12:18 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
2016-12-16 21:12:18 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1481922738.85.0.797482219477.issue28991@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-12-16 21:12:18 | rhettinger | link | issue28991 messages |
2016-12-16 21:12:18 | rhettinger | create | |
|