➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author yselivanov
Recipients Adam Gregory, docs@python, eric.smith, gvanrossum, yselivanov
Date 2016-12-12.15:51:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1481557916.39.0.499284976156.issue28942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> I was going to say "no", but given that "yield" works, I think it is
reasonable to allow "await" as well. (And what about "yield from"?)

Agree.

I suspect the reason is that async/await aren't proper keywords in 3.5/3.6, and the hacks we have in tokenizer to recognize them aren't working in f-strings.

I'll assign this issue to myself to make sure it's resolved in 3.7 once we make async/await keywords.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-12-12 15:51:56yselivanovsetrecipients: + yselivanov, gvanrossum, eric.smith, docs@python, Adam Gregory
2016-12-12 15:51:56yselivanovsetmessageid: <1481557916.39.0.499284976156.issue28942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-12-12 15:51:56yselivanovlinkissue28942 messages
2016-12-12 15:51:56yselivanovcreate